» Jonas Ferry on things of interest

10 films, part 12

1 Sep 2006 — categorized in film

Zatôichi (Takeshi Kitano, 2003). The blind masseur/swordsman Zatôichi gangs up with two geishas to defeat a common enemy. Oh, the blood! They used CGI effects to create the blood spurts, but didn’t even try to make them look realistic. The dreamlike effect of the blood spurts hanging in midair for half a second is beautiful. A good samurai movie, with the two geisha’s pasts being quite creepy. [8/10]

The United States of Leland (Matthew Ryan Hoge, 2003). A young man is sent to a jail for juveniles after killing another boy, and is befriended by one of the teachers who wants to write a book about him. This movie tries so hard to be profound, but falls well short of the line. [5/10]

Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Steven Spielberg, 1977). Aliens visiting Earth, and the people whose lives are affected. This is a good film, apart from the annoying tone sequence that was repeated until it burned itself into my brain, most interesting as a story of people obsessed with things others can’t see. [7/10]

Eyes Without a Face (original title: Les Yeux sans visage (Georges Franju, 1960). A plastic surgeon and his female assistant kidnaps young women to remove their faces and put on the doctor’s daughter deformed face. A chilling story, with the eerie mood increased by the daughter “floating” around in the mansion with a nondescript white mask on her face to hide all emotions. [8/10]

Ken Park (Larry Clark and Edward Lachman, 2002). A bunch of kids with different difficulties in their lives, mostly with parents, look for calm and support in each other. They really manage to make the parents unsympathetic (child molesting fathers, beer-drinking pregnant mothers), but in the end the whole message of the film is “shrug”. [7/10]

Funny Games (Michael Haneke, 1997). Two men attack a family in their home and makes them perform sadistic games. A statement on media violence and how we as viewers respond to it, the film breaks the fourth wall a couple of times to great effect. [9/10]

Paths of Glory (Stanley Kubrick, 1957). In the trenches of World War I a number of soldiers are sentenced to death acting cowardly to cover up the superiors’ tactical mistakes. A very good film that conveys it’s message brilliantly. You can almost taste the hopelessness of the soldiers’ situation. [9/10]

Intacto (Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, 2001). Some people have the ability to steal people’s luck by touching them, and then compete against each other in games of chance to decide who’s the luckiest. Visually very good, with a nice story and cool games. Also, Max von Sydow plays the luckiest man on Earth, and he’s good as always. [8/10]

Happiness (Todd Solondz, 1998). This ironically titled film is about different people being unhappy with various things in their lives. The humor is pitch black, but I rather enjoyed it. It was fun to see Cynthia Stevenson playing the sister of someone called “Joy”, as her character in Dead Like Me (TV-series, 2003) is called exactly that. Then again, I don’t know how common the name is in America. [8/10]

Julien Donkey-Boy (Harmony Korine (uncredited), 1999). Julien is a schizophrenic man, and in disjointed scenes we follow him in different parts of his life. I liked that Korine had used a relative as a basis for the character, as he feels real, and I really liked Werner Herzog as the father. But I didn’t like the obvious event that happened to the sister, how you can’t know if you’re supposed to be mad because exactly what you expect happens. [7/10]

4 Comments »

  1. Comment by Helena 1 Sep 2006:

    Out of these ten we've only seen three together - I think that's a new record. We haven't really been on compatible schedules this summer.

  2. Comment by Fredrik 1 Sep 2006:

    Out of curiosity, did you watch the director's cut of “Close Encounters…”? The dir. cut version focusses a bit more on the breakdown of the main character's family, which makes it more interesting. Both versions include the silly ufo flying over the road-scene, which I personally dislike. It does hint at the fact that the movie isn't really about the actual encounter with aliens, but still, I like my aliens revealed in style :)

  3. Comment by Fredrik 1 Sep 2006:

    Also, the annoying notes from “Close Encounters…” are played by the springfield school band while the camera pans by them in the Simpsons episode about, well, an alien encounter (the one with the x-files agents, Mulder & Scully).

  4. Comment by Jonas 1 Sep 2006:

    Yeah, it must've been that version. I looked at the alternate version page at IMDb, and they list three versions:

    1. The Original Version, released one year early (1977) against Spielberg's wishes due to financial troubles of Columbia Pictures.
    2. The Special Edition, released three years after the original version (1980) when Spielberg got money from Columbia to re-shoot several scenes.
    3. The Collector's Edition, released on video in 1998 and on DVD in 2001.

    They say #3 is basically a composite of the two earlier versions and include (I quote)…

    1. The Neary family's alternate longer introduction.
    2. The 5-second flyover of the power company truck.
    3. The scene where Roy Neary argues with his wife and goes crazy is included.
    4. The shot of a UFO scanning a roadside McDonald's sign is not included.
    5. The Air Force base press conference scene has been restored from the original version.
    6. The scene where Roy throws dirt, plants and bricks through his kitchen window has been restored.
    7. This version does not contain the mothership ending from the “Special Edition”, and retains the original 1977 end title music.

    … which makes it clear that's the version I saw because I would've remembered that McDonald's sign (I boycott them). Roy both went a little crazy and threw a lot of dirt trough a window, so yes.

    I was a bit surprised that the main character abandoned his family the way he did, and went on a making-out trip on a hillside with a strange woman. I expected something more Ebba och Didrik, with the nuclear family safely returned together at the end after the husband's little trip into the unknown. But no, that's not the way it ends. I have to say I liked this variant better. He had to sacrifice his family for the thing he believed in, which I guess is a pretty strong statement.

Leave a comment

Login »

« 10 films, part 11Ping complaints »